Few sports have ever successfully navigated upheaval
like college football has experienced over the past decade. The NCAA has come
under intense scrutiny, both for letting certain favored schools off the hook and
for failing to properly punish impropriety. The newly-minted playoff created to
fix the BCS is already hearing calls for expansion, while conference realignment
has rendered the national landscape virtually unrecognizable.
What’s more, the game itself has changed radically
in the last 10 years. The possession-based action of the early-to-mid-2000’s
has vanished, embraced now by only a handful of holdout schools. The
revolutionary spread option authored by visionaries Urban Meyer, Chip Kelly and
Gus Malzahn has become the norm Infused with new-age up-tempo and old-school
Run and Shoot tactics, the spread has shattered previously-held notions of
offensive potential.
Yet the more things change, the more they stay the
same. Time-honored maxims still apply in college football, even with all the
flashy improvements to the sport. Having a superior quarterback is still the
shortest route to victory. Winning the line of scrimmage still wins games. And
as Alabama has so aptly demonstrated in this most imbalanced of sports, championships
are still reserved for the hyper-elite.
The Crimson Tide have won four of the last seven
National Championships, accumulating a national-best 72-10 record (87.8
percent). Here are Bama’s recruiting class rankings since the start of the last
decade: 5, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 3. Is it shocking in any way that the Tide seem
nigh-unbeatable at times? Alabama has bent even the mighty SEC to its will.
The Playoff was intended to provide a “true”
national champion – the best team, decided on the field. Unfortunately, it may
have done just that. The other three teams to win a title during Bama’s run –
Ohio State, Florida State and Auburn – all also consistently recruit at an
elite level. It’s almost impossible now to win the championship without an
entire roster built of top-15 recruiting classes (at worst). The most
impressive achievement of this decade might be Oregon’s second-best national
record of 69-12 (85.2 percent) with a high class ranking of just 11.
(Conversely, there’s no uglier track record than Texas’ 41-35 in the past seven
years despite an average recruiting ranking of ninth overall.)
So the question now is not, “Can anyone beat
Alabama?” It’s “Can anyone recruit like Bama?” The Crimson Tide have lost
games. They are beatable in a micro sense, on a good day against a quality
opponent. But Bama is winning the war, stockpiling elite talent to both use and
hide away from other schools (and prevent from transferring, another of Nick
Saban’s unseemly practices). It’s going to take schools like Ohio State, Notre
Dame and USC to even the playing field, and – despite the Buckeyes’ win in the
2014 Playoff – even those historic powers are having a rough go of it.
At this point my choice to win the National
Championship is probably pretty clear. But as always, I do more than predict a
single team to win the title. The pool of true contenders is a small one,
particularly so this season, and I’ll elaborate on the teams I think have a
shot in the section below. Group A is comprised of the hyper-elite, the favorites
to win their respective conferences and make the College Football Playoff. Group
B is made up of squads I like but feel need help to reach that
ultimate goal. New this year, Group C will consist of teams that have talent
but also fatal flaws that keep them out of true contention.
Group A
Alabama
Might as well get it out of the way. Alabama has
flaws, just like any team. The Crimson Tide lost a decent chunk of the starting
defense, including star linebacker Reggie Ragland and tackle A’Shawn Robinson.
QB Jake Coker is gone, as is Heisman-winning running back Derrick Henry and his
backup Kenyan Drake. I doubt Nick Saban cares. Remember those recruiting
rankings? The Tide can plug in another half-dozen elite defensive players and
not miss a beat.
The RB situation is more tenuous, though there’s
little question a quality rotation will emerge given the talent available. QB
is the real question mark, but Alabama seems to be the one team in the country
relatively immune to such concerns. Whereas teams like LSU and Texas (which
also recruit elite defensive players) seem to be held back by their mediocre
signal-callers, Bama inevitably finds a decent, efficient passer who manages
games and doesn’t muck up the good work of the defense and running game. It’s
the Alabama Way, and the reason this team has to be considered the favorite to
repeat.
Ohio
State
OSU has a delightful September matchup with Oklahoma
and must travel to both Wisconsin and Michigan State, but it’s doubtful the
Buckeyes will be anything less than very, very good. A lot of key defenders are
gone, and yes, so are RB Ezekiel Elliott and the top three receivers. But like
Alabama, Ohio State has the luxury of simply reloading, and the re-insertion of
QB J.T. Barrett (a 2014 First-Team All-Big Ten player) will ease the
transition.
The Big Ten is also significantly weaker than the
SEC, which partially accounts for the Buckeyes’ recent success. Michigan is on
the rise with Jim Harbaugh, but the Wolverines still have a ways to go to catch
their rival. The odds are against Michigan State sustaining the same level of
elite play, and the entire West Division is largely a non-threat. Urban Meyer
is too good to allow this squad to drop from contention.
Oklahoma
I hate myself a little for including the Sooners
here. How many times does this team have to flop on the big stage before it
stops getting preseason hype? Bob Stoops lost the right to the moniker “Big
Game Bob” with his atrocious game plan against Clemson in last year’s Playoff
semifinal, although if we’re being honest he probably deserved to lose it about
a decade ago (if not earlier). The Big 12 has lost a great deal of its luster,
providing a noticeable lack of preparation for its marquee teams on the big
stage. The Sooners have gotten throttled in their last two postseason contests,
too. So why do I believe this year?
The truth is that I simply have more faith in OU
than any of its Big 12 peers, especially now that Baylor’s program and image have
taken such a hit in the last six months. Oklahoma has perhaps the nation’s best
QB behind center in Baker Mayfield, which eases quite a few of my fears. The
Big 12 slate is navigable, and there are two meaty opportunities for respect in
the non-league schedule in the form of Houston and Ohio State. I expect the
Sooners to repeat as conference champs, and with that will almost assuredly
come a Playoff invite.
Clemson
The Tigers face the impossible task of living up the
greatest season in school history in 2015. They’ll be doing it without five of
their top six tacklers from last year and with a daunting road contest at
Florida State on the schedule, a game that will likely decide the ACC’s
champion and Playoff entrant. There’s also the specter of the close loss in the
National Championship, which could potentially haunt this squad.
While the defense might be weaker, however, the
offense will probably be even more potent. Desahun Watson is a legit star at
the QB position, and more importantly, his team will face a pretty
cupcake-laden slate in the tepid ACC. Outside of the showdown with the
Seminoles there’s nobody who can come close to the Tigers in 2016, turning this
into essentially a one-game season. Better teams than Clemson have stumbled on
the illusion of non-pressure such a schedule provides. We’ll see how they
handle being the favorite.
Florida
State
Unlike Clemson, the Seminoles actually play a real
schedule, with an opening week tilt against Ole Miss as well as a
cross-division draw of Coastal contenders Miami (FL) and North Carolina (as
opposed to the Tigers’ eye-rolling draw of Georgia Tech and Pittsburgh). That
schedule is probably the biggest impediment to a conference
championship/Playoff berth type of season, though Clemson will certainly have a
say about that as well.
The case for the Seminoles is talent; like Alabama
and Ohio State, this squad can simply reload. Five of past six recruiting
classes have been in the top five nationally, including 2016’s No. 1 class
overall. Clemson was the better team last year but still had trouble pulling
away from the ‘Noles, indicative of the talent gap between the two programs.
And yes, FSU does have to start a freshman at QB… but as I recall, that worked
out pretty well the last time.
Group B
LSU
Oh, LSU. The anti-Bama. Both schools recruit for
defense and the offensive line first, then try to insert a QB who just won’t
lose games. Yet at every turn, the Crimson Tide seem to find an
average-to-solid game manager, while the Tigers always trot out some incompetent
sap. All the pieces are here again, with 17 returning starters and a host of
blue-chip talent. The main issue is once again the QB and if Les Miles can finally
coax something resembling respectability out of his passing offense (The secondary issue is how long Miles gets to coast on his flukey 2007 championship he won with Nick Saban's players).
Brandon Harris isn’t a lost cause, but a 54 percent
completion percentage and a 13-6 touchdown-to-interception ratio isn’t going to
cut it in 2016. The Tigers have gotten exactly one quality QB season in the
last eight years, and even Zach Mettenberger’s impressive 2013 campaign was preceded
by a highly disappointing 2012. This team has all the talent in the world, but
unless it figures out an offense beyond “Run Leonard Fournette into the ground,”
it’s going to come up short against elite competition again.
Ole
Miss
The Rebels are sort of the inverse LSU, with the
SEC’s top QB in Chad Kelly but holes elsewhere that will likely sink their
championship dreams. It’s not going to be easy to replace the offense’s top
three playmakers or all-world D-lineman Robert Nkemdiche, but the Rebels have
recruited well enough over the past few years – some might say suspiciously
well – to not fall off the map.
In the end a lack of continuity will probably doom
this team, despite the individual brilliance of Kelly. Ole Miss was lucky to
beat Alabama last year and won’t do so again. A season-opening showdown with a
Florida State team eager to leap back into the national spotlight is another
huge landmine. It seems unlikely the Rebels will continue to defy the odds and
improve their record for the fifth straight season.
Notre
Dame
The Fighting Irish have again orchestrated a nasty
independent schedule (as well they should). There’s a trip to a potentially
resurgent Texas in Week One, showdowns with quality Miami (FL) and Navy teams,
and of course the traditional battles with Michigan State, Stanford and USC. A
lack of experience (just nine returning starters) will make a successful
campaign against that slate a tall order, but if they pull it off the Irish
will certainly be in the Playoff.
In Notre Dame’s favor is a very favorable QB
situation, as highly-touted passers DeShone Kizer and Malik Zaire compete for
the right to be guided by Brian Kelly’s very steady – and QB-friendly – hand.
The maximum of 12 games is a hindrance that allows no room for error, but this
team almost made the Playoff last year against a tougher schedule. Count out
Notre Dame at your peril.
Houston
Houston is a very interesting wild card. Normally
I’d be wary of a mid-major that lost several starters and was coming off a
dream season. Those are strong indicators of a regression to the mean, even in
a weaker conference like the AAC. However, there are two key factors working in
Houston’s favor that point to a potential triumphant follow-up to 2015’s 13-1
campaign.
First, there’s QB Greg Ward, one of the nation’s
most dynamic dual-threat players. Second, there’s the schedule, which is
seemingly crafted by destiny to ensure the Cougars become the first Group of
Five school to make the Playoff. The AAC slate doesn’t do Houston any favors,
with road trips to fellow contenders Cincinnati, Navy and Memphis. But two big
non-conference showdowns with Power Five programs – at home against Louisville
in November and a “neutral site” opener against Oklahoma in the Houston Texans’
NRG Stadium – can boost this squad’s credibility even more after last season’s
finish. What’s more, if Houston runs the table, it will potentially eliminate a
Power Five champion in the Sooners, clearing its own path to the Playoff.
Group C
Tennessee
The Volunteers are getting a lot of hype, which is
fair for a team that returns 17 starters and appears to have finally crawled out
of the mess that began at the end of the Phil Fulmer era. 2016’s schedule is
the reason to really be excited about this team, though. Much of the SEC East
is hapless (the last five games are almost assuredly wins), and as long as the
Vols can split their Florida/Georgia series’ they’ll be in good position to win
the division. In the end, UT probably isn’t quite good enough yet to be a real
threat, but I understand the buzz.
Michigan
Jim Harbaugh, irritating though he may be, is a
quality coach. Michigan is clearly on the rise with him at the helm, and the
future showdowns he’ll have with Ohio State’s Urban Meyer should have fans
salivating. But this is a little too soon. The Wolverines must travel to
Michigan State, Iowa and OSU, and they aren’t winning all those games. The rest
of the Big Ten is soft, so anything less than 12-1 won’t impress the committee
enough to merit a Playoff invite.
Boise
State
If Houston, why not Boise State? I’m glad you asked.
BYU and Washington State are worthy non-conference foes, sure, but they don’t
measure up to Louisville and Oklahoma. What’s more, the AAC is better than the
Mountain West, offering fewer opportunities for impressive poll-boosting wins. It’s
possible both the Broncos and San Diego State could go 12-0 to set up a massive
conference championship game showdown, but even then, BSU (or SDSU) would take
a backseat to an undefeated Houston.
Pac-12
Champion
It’s an ugly proposition after the conference was
left out of the Playoff a year ago, but I don’t see the Pac-12 getting in.
There aren’t any elite teams and there are too many above-average teams.
Oregon, Stanford, Washington and Washington State are going to beat each other
up in the North, while UCLA, USC and Utah should make the South a bloodbath as
well. This could potentially be the most thrilling conference race in the
country, but I doubt anyone makes it out with fewer than two losses. This will
be covered more in-depth in my Pac-12 preview.
The pool is small this year. Alabama has raised the
bar for title contention. It’s no longer good enough to be above-average, get
lucky and win your conference. Recruiting is maybe more important than ever,
and the Playoff committee has already put pressure on Power Five teams to strengthen
scheduling, which will make those whirlwind dream seasons against weak
competition significantly less likely. The new era of college football has now
begun.
With the Playoff contenders down, the next topic is
how we’ll get to that point. Seeing elite teams schedule other Power Five
programs in non-league action is very promising, but it’s the conference season
that truly matters in college football. Tomorrow, I’ll explore the individual
conference races and make picks for each division and league champion.
No comments:
Post a Comment